Showing posts with label Musical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Musical. Show all posts

Friday, July 10, 2026

Moana: It’s déjà vu all over again...

Moana (2026) • View trailer
3.5 stars (out of five); rated PG, for action peril, scary images and rude humor
Available via: Movie theaters
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 7.12.26

The window between Disney’s animated features and these semi-live-action remakes seems to be shortening, given that Moana 2 sailed into theaters just two years ago. This new film’s arrival feels somewhat cynical: driven more by corporate greed than art.

 

Resolutely embracing her destiny, Moana (Catherine Laga'aia) bravely sets sail, to restore
order to what has become an existential ecological threat to her people. Fortunately,
she won't be alone for too long...
But if the enthusiastic crowd for Wednesday evening’s sold-out preview is any indication, this new version of Moana will be a monster hit anyway. (Pun intended.)

It’s easy to see why. The characters are engaging, well defined and capably portrayed; the Pacific island setting is colorful and laden with captivating cultural touches; the focus on female empowerment is always welcome; and the underlying message of caring for the fragile interconnectedness of nature is a lesson that bears constant repeating these days.

 

All this said, the first half of Jared Bush and Dana Ledoux Miller’s script is far more satisfying than the second half, during which the ubiquitous songs also become more intrusive.

 

Matters totally jump the shark when the giant crab Tamatoa (voiced by Jemaine Clement, as he did in the original) unexpectedly bursts into song. This essentially is a retread of the sea witch Ursula’s similar expository sequence in 1989’s The Little Mermaid, but her song — “Poor Unfortunate Souls” — was laced with genuine menace, as was Ursula herself.

 

Tamatoa is nothing more than tedious comic relief, which destroys this film story’s flow.

 

But that comes later. Events begin during a prologue, as the shape-shifting trickster demigod Maui (Dwayne Johnson) steals the bright green, emerald-like heart of Te Fiti, the life-giving mother island goddess who embodies creation. The insufferably cocky and narcissistic Maui does so under the belief that it will win him love and adoration, when in fact he has unleashed a terrible darkness.

 

One thousand years later, we meet the jovial, hard-working denizens of the island Motunui, during a marvelously choreographed dance sequence set to the lively song “Tulou Tagaloa.” This community is ruled by Chief Tui (John Tui), who with his wife Sina (Frankie Adams) are the doting parents of 4-year-old Moana (Emma Puahi-Shapazian, in these early scenes).

 

The little girl has a strong attachment to the ocean, whose waters respond in kind; they part one morning, to reveal a brightly colored shell. She retrieves it; the waters part to reveal another ... and, then, the missing heart of Te Fiti. But she’s suddenly snatched up by her father, who warns Moana to resist the lure of the ocean, because his people have learned never to travel beyond the island’s surrounding reef.

 

The heart is left behind, swallowed again by the sea. (Or is it?)

 

Friday, January 17, 2025

Emilia Pérez: Breathtakingly original

Emilia Pérez (2024) • View trailer
3.5 stars (out of five). Rated R, for profanity, violence and frank sexual content
Available via: Netflix

Wildly operatic, transgender, quasi-farcical cartel telenovela musical mash-ups — in Spanish, of course — don’t come along very often.

 

Enraged by the criminal scum she has spent a career representing, Rita (Zoe Saldaña)
vents her fury during the first act's show-stopping production number.


Depending on one’s open-mindedness, French director/co-writer Jacques Audiard’s dream project is either a wildly imaginative phenomenon — after all, it took the Jury Prize at last year’s Cannes Film Festival — or a ludicrously overcooked mess that repeatedly betrays its characters.

I lean toward the former, with some misgivings. Whatever its occasional faults, Emilia Pérez covers strong dramatic territory, and boasts some truly show-stopping production numbers.

 

The elevator-pitch plot summary: Mexican drug kingpin Juan “Manitas” Del Monte, who for his entire life has wished to escape his cycle of violence and death, embraces gender-affirming surgery and emerges as Emilia Pérez, a stylish, soon-to-be-much-admired advocate for citizens whose friends and relatives have been “disappeared.”

 

Of course, it isn’t that simple. Emilia soon discovers that a new identity — indeed, an entire transformation — cannot erase one’s heart and soul, not to mention a lifetime of vicious behavior patterns.

 

But all that comes later. Audiard — aided by co-writers Thomas Bidegain, Léa Mysius and Nicolas Livecchi — begin by introducing the story’s true protagonist: Rita Moro Castro (Zoe Saldaña), a talented but overtaxed 40-year-old defense attorney, who is increasingly sickened by a career spent helping cartel thugs, murderers and wife-killers avoid prison.

 

Right out of the gate, Saldaña proves that she owns this film.

 

Rita’s anger and self-loathing are highlighted in the first dazzling production number, “El Alegato,” as she moves among hundreds of folks in a street market, chanting and singing while typing notes and then striding toward court, with everybody around her quickly drawn into the action. It’s an explosive display of cinematographer Paul Guilhaume’s inventive camera placement, Juliette Welfing’s tight editing, and Damien Jalet’s vibrant choreography.

 

The result is a show-stopper on par with the similarly fantastic “Another Day of Sun” freeway sequence, which opens 2016’s La La Land.

 

Rita’s professional talent hasn’t gone entirely unnoticed; she’s abruptly brought before Manitas (Karla Sofía Gascón), a terrifying, tattoo-covered figure with gold teeth and a menacing aura that could smother the faint of heart. He makes her the ultimate offer that cannot be refused: Find a surgeon who’ll handle a gender transition, safely relocate his family in the wake of “his” death, and navigate all the tricky legal details ... after which she’ll be paid more money than she ever could have imagined.

 

But the clock is ticking, since Manitas already has (secretly) begun hormone therapy. “Your predecessor wasted too much time,” he warns.

 

The subsequent whirlwind montage hits high burlesque with “La Vaginoplastia,” a production number set in a Bangkok transitional surgery clinic, where Rita learns all about the, um, necessary snips, tucks, folds and so forth. (This is likely the moment when puritanical viewers will choose to escape.)

 

But then Audiard abruptly shifts emotional gears — not for the last time — when Rita finally encounters an Israeli surgeon (Mark Ivanir, as Dr. Wasserman) willing to consider the procedure. During their quiet and surprisingly emotional duet, “Lady,” he warns that he can change the body ... but he cannot change the mind.

 

Manitas vanishes into surgery and post-operative recovery, with everybody believing him killed and vanished by a narco rival. By this point, we’ve also met his wife, Jessi (Selena Gomez), a self-centered little tart who pays scant attention to their two children; Rita relocates all three to Switzerland.

 

According to the original plan, that should be the end of it.

 

But no.

 

Four years pass. Rita has blossomed into a respected attorney on the proper side of the law. During a fancy dinner laden with movers and shakers, she’s seated next to a striking and impressively dressed woman. It doesn’t take Rita more than a few heartbeats to realize that this charismatic figure — Emilia Pérez (also played by Gascón) — is Manitas’ new identity.

 

And she wants to be reunited with her children. (Cue the warning bells.)

 

Rita arranges this; Jessi and the children return to Mexico, and move into the opulent home of “Manitas’ distant cousin,” Emilia. That this charade succeeds is the story’s biggest eyebrow lift, because — honestly — Manitas and Emilia don’t look that different. 

 

The very notion would descend into farce, except that Audiard once again plays against expectation, with the film’s most poignant song: “Papa,” a lament that unfolds as “Auntie Emilia” tucks her young son into bed one night. “You smell like Papa,” the boys says, sleepily curling into her arms; the play of emotions on Gascón’s face is shattering.

 

Wanting to atone for previous bad behavior, Emilia enlists Rita to help set up a foundation, La Lucecita, devoted to finding the more than 10,000 people missing in this region alone. But the bloom quickly fades from this rose — for Rita — when Emilia is forced to solicit funds, during a fancy charity dinner, from a room laden with corrupt politicians, judges and public figures.

 

Rita’s wrath at this hypocrisy explodes into the second dazzling production number: “El Mal,” a cheeky, rock-and-rap extravaganza that sends Saldaña striding, writhing and bouncing around the room and onto tables, as Rita — entirely in her imagination — announces and castigates the vile secrets shared by this deplorable ruling elite.

 

This sequence will, fer shur, earn Saldaña an Oscar nomination.

 

In terms of storyline, matters subsequently go from bad to worse, building to what obviously will be Shakespearean-style tragedy.

 

That said, the increasingly grim third act also features several notable musical performances: “Mi Camino,” a vibrant, karaoke-style number sung by Gomez, which highlight’s the story’s themes of love and identity; and “El Amor,” a soft duet between Gascón and Adriana Paz, who enters proceedings as Emilia’s new lover, Epifania.

 

Even when the primary characters aren’t bursting into song, their dialogue frequently shifts from spoken words to softly chanted ballads with oft-repeated lyrics. Almost all of these narrative-enhancing tunes are written and sometimes performed by French singer/songwriter Camille, working with composer Clément Ducol.

 

In fairness, viewers who faithfully hang on during this film’s 132 minutes likely will be moved by the finale. Audiard definitely knows how to work one’s emotions.

 

However...

 

Gomez is a glaringly weak link; her acting chops simply aren’t up to the script’s demands, and she pales alongside Saldaña and Gascón. (Gomez’s Spanish also has been faulted severely, but I can’t judge that.) 

 

It also should be noted that Mexican viewers are enraged by Audiard’s stereotypical depiction of their culture — he made the entire film in France, on sound stages — and GLAAD has branded the story a “step back” for transgender representation.


Whether this matters will be up to individual viewers, and the film is certain to be quite polarizing. There’s no denying the uniqueness of Audiard’s bold vision, but I’m not sure Emilia Pérez ever will find the audience it deserves.

 

Friday, January 12, 2024

Mean Girls: Spitefully high-spirited

Mean Girls (2024) • View trailer
Four stars (out of five). Rated PG-13, for sexual candor, profanity and bad teen behavior
Available via: Movie theaters
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 1.12.24

Confucius said it best, so long ago:

 

“Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves.”

 

While Cady (Angourie Rice, far right) watches apprehensively, her school's "mean girls"
— from left, Karen (Avantika), Regina (Reneé Rapp) and Gretchen (Bebe Wood) —
reveal the "Burn Book," in which they've written all manner of nasty comments about
fellow students.


Unlikely as it seems, this story has become even more relevant today, than it was when scripter Tina Fey’s clever adaptation of Rosalind Wiseman’s 2002 parental guide — Queen Bees and Wannabes — became a popular 2004 film for Lindsay Lohan.

Although it seemed an unlikely choice to transition into a musical, Mean Girls became a Broadway hit upon opening in 2018; Fey wrote the show’s book, accompanied by Jeff Richmond (music) and Nell Benjamin (lyrics). Touring productions continue to this day, and a film adaptation was inevitable; directors Samantha Jayne and Arturo Perez Jr. — with a script once again by Fey — have delivered a thoroughly entertaining two hours of lively razzle-dazzle.

 

(And I have to wonder: Was Fey prescient, two decades back? Did she somehow know that the dark side of social media would make this story fresh again?)

 

All of the original film’s essential plot beats have been retained; many have been re-tooled as energetic production numbers by choreographer Kyle Hanagami.

 

The first is a seemingly spontaneous, home-made garage video by Janis ’Imi’iki (Auli’I Cravalho) and Damian Hubbard (Jaquel Spivey, a force of nature), who function throughout this saga as both characters and a Greek chorus. This opening number, “A Cautionary Tale,” sets the stage for the events to follow. (Pay close attention; their promised details will prove accurate.)

 

The scene then shifts to Kenya, where 16-year-old Cady Heron (Angourie Rice) — despite having thoroughly enjoyed studying animals and stars in the wild, with her mother (Jenna Fischer) — laments her inability to enjoy a “normal” teenage experience. Mom relents, moves them to Evanston, Ill., and Cady eagerly begins her first day at North Shore High School...

 

...and hasn’t the slightest notion how to fit in.

 

A droll montage introduces her various teachers and subjects, most importantly the AP math class taught by Ms. Norbury (Fey, reprising her role from the 2004 film). Cady winds up sitting behind Aaron Samuels (Christopher Briney), and is instantly smitten.

 

Lunchtime is the worst, as Cady slowly walks down the center aisle, silently shunned by the cliques at each table. Janis and Damian — outcasts themselves, and proud of it — take pity and rescue her from social oblivion.

 

Then the air is sucked out of the cafeteria, as queen bee-yatch Regina (Reneé Rapp, deliciously haughty) makes her entrance, joining her already seated posse, Gretchen (Bebe Wood) and Karen (Avantika). They’re “The Plastics,” over-the-top glamour girls with nothing but disdain for the common herd. Regina spots Cady, and — much to everybody’s surprise — invites the new girl to their table.

 

Friday, December 29, 2023

Maestro: Rhapsodic

Maestro (2023) • View trailer
Four stars (out of five). Rated R, for profanity and drug use
Available via: Netflix
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 1.5.24

This film’s title suggests that it’s about a man: acclaimed composer/conductor Leonard “Lenny” Bernstein.

 

But that’s not entirely true. Director Bradley Cooper’s thoughtful, lovingly crafted tone poem actually focuses on the lengthy, loving and tempestuous relationship between Bernstein and actress Felicia Montealegre Cohn.

 

When Felicia (Carey Mulligan) wants Lenny (Bradley Cooper) to slow down and truly
pay attention to her, they sit in a field, back to back: a sweet tableau laden with
quiet intimacy.


The result certainly is one of the year’s most visually sumptuous and imaginatively staged dramas. Cooper and cinematographer Matthew Libatique collaborated meticulously, almost intimately, in a manner rarely seen in today’s films; every setting, every frame, is a work of art.

Cooper and Libatique also worked together on 2018’s A Star Is Born, which earned the latter a well-deserved Academy Award nomination.

 

As was the case with that earlier film, Cooper again wears three hats: director, co-scripter — with Josh Singer — and star. Thanks to the finely crafted work of prosthetic makeup designer Kazu Hiro, Cooper’s transformation is uncanny: particularly during the onset of Bernstein’s career, in the 1940s. 

 

The performance goes much deeper than mere appearance. Cooper also nails the cadence of Lenny’s stiff, formal manner of speaking — adding emphasis with frequent pauses, as if ensuring his listeners are hanging onto every word — along with the man’s charismatic presence. He wasn’t merely the most interesting person in a given room; he consumed the very atmosphere.

 

He talks — and smokes — constantly. His running commentary is as relentless as the chained cigarettes.

 

Lenny also was his own, fiercest taskmaster. We get a sense that he rarely slowed down — perhaps didn’t even know how to do so — because he wanted to maximize the potential of each moment: whether composing, conducting, teaching, partying or indulging in a liberated sexual lifestyle that occasionally threatened his career.

 

The latter is a running undercurrent in Cooper and Singer’s script, which is drawn heavily from archival video footage, documentaries and interviews — notably those by TV newsman Edward R. Murrow and journalist John Gruen, briefly depicted in this film — and daughter Jamie Bernstein’s 2018 memoir, Famous Father Girl.

 

Following a brief color prologue that catches an aging Lenny during a solemn, meditative moment, the film stock shifts to monochrome as we bounce back to the World War II era, and the fortuitous event that launched his career. After having spent a few preceding years in Manhattan teaching piano and coaching singers, Lenny was appointed assistant conductor of the New York Philharmonic.

 

His lucky break came on November 14, 1943, when guest conductor Bruno Walter called in sick at the last moment. Lenny made his debut on short notice, without any rehearsal, facing an ambitious program that included works by Richard Strauss, Miklôs Rózsa and Richard Wagner.

 

Between the live national CBS Radio broadcast and the following day’s celebratory front-page story in The New York Times, Lenny became famous overnight.

Friday, December 15, 2023

The Archies: A delightful surprise

The Archies (2023) • View trailer
Four stars (out of five). Rated TV-14, and suitable for all ages
Available via: Netflix
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 12.17.23

All right, class; raise your hand if you read Archie comic books as a kid.

 

Seriously? I didn’t expect to see so many hands from twenty- and thirty-somethings!

 

Betty (Khushi Kapoor) is madly in love with Archie (Agastya Nanda), but he's torn between
her and richest-girl-in-town Veronica. Which will he choose?


And I never could have expected, in my wildest imagination, that we’d get a Bollywood adaptation of that franchise, much less this late in the game.

Or that such a film would be so much fun.

 

Director Zoya Akhtar’s charmingly retro Indian musical will be adored by everybody who made television’s Glee a monster hit for so many years. Everything about Akhtar’s film is note perfect for its early 1960s setting: Suzanne Caplan Merwanji’s small-town production design; Poornamrita Singh’s colorful, old-school costumes — researched via the archives of Vogue, Esquire, Sears and other period magazines and catalogues — that precisely suit each character; and a roster of young talent that totally sells this throwback concept.

 

I had flashbacks to the playfully energetic atmosphere that characterized Depression-era musicals, when Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland said, “Hey kids, let’s put on a show!”

 

Akhtar does indeed put on a show.

 

The note-faithful replication of this comic book universe owes its authenticity to the script by Akhtar, Farhan Akhtar and Ayesha DeVitre, working in full cooperation with Archie Comics Publications. (Pre-credits artwork proves as much.)

 

The setting is the fictional Anglo-Indian hill station town of Riverdale (apparently located in a part of India that hasn’t been discovered until now). It’s a bucolic community laden with small, family-owned shops, where everybody knows each other.

 

Riverdale’s founding, explained during a brief prologue told via animated rod puppets, took place after Indian independence. The residents celebrated their new freedoms by planting trees in the names of their children; over the years this space — christened Green Park — became the much-loved center of town.

 

This information dump, during a prologue, comes fast and furious: almost too quickly to read all the subtitles while trying to absorb the artwork. But don’t panic; the subtitles are easier to follow once past this prologue, in great part because everybody slides back and forth between Hindi and English, sometimes within a single sentence. Well over half the movie is in English.

Friday, May 26, 2023

The Little Mermaid: Waterlogged

The Little Mermaid (2023) • View trailer
2.5 stars (out of five). Rated PG, for dramatic intensity and some scary images
Available via: Movie theaters
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 5.26.23

Following in the lamentable footsteps of 2017’s live-action Beauty and the Beast, which transformed its absolutely perfect animated predecessor into a 129-minute slog, this live-action update of 1989’s 83-minute charmer similarly has become an even more bloated 135-minute exercise in tedium.

 

When Prince Eric (Jonah Hauer-King) nearly drowns, following the loss of his ship,
Ariel (Halle Bailey) manages to save him, and drag him to shore.


I’ve no idea why Disney continues to tarnish the memory of these legacy classics, particularly when this one has been done so clumsily. The original Alan Menken/Howard Ashman song score has been “enhanced” with three new tunes by Menken and lyricist Lin-Manuel Miranda, and — all due respect to the latter’s better credentials — the mis-match is glaring.

 

Worse yet, Miranda also added additional lyrics to several of Ashman’s existing songs, which were perfectly fine to begin with, thank you very much.

 

David Magee’s updated — and protracted — script apparently was designed to inject a new subtext of inclusiveness: a usually welcome theme which, alas, is delivered here with the subtlety of a sledge hammer. (I’m not one to scream “woke” at the drop of a fin, but good grief, folks; was the overkill really necessary?)

 

2021’s Luca handled this far more gracefully.

 

All of this is a shame, because Halle Bailey is sensational as this new film’s Ariel. She has terrific screen presence, a gorgeous — and powerful — singing voice, and an expressive face that conveys a wealth of emotion. The one saving grace of the otherwise tiresome second hour — which spends far too much time with Ariel navigating her human form in the prince’s castle — is the endearing charm of her muteness (having traded her voice for legs).

 

But that’s getting ahead of things. A quick recap, for newcomers:

 

Ariel, one of the seven daughters of King Triton (Javier Bardem, pompously grave), has long been fascinated by the intriguing trinkets and tchotchkes that occasionally fall overboard from passing ships (or, less happily, which she salvages from shipwrecks). This is a source of amusement to her best friends, Flounder the fish (voiced by Jacob Tremblay) and Sebastian the crab (Daveed Diggs), who also is Triton’s major-domo.

 

Whenever Ariel surfaces, in order to clandestinely observe the mysterious doings of these humans in their passing ships, her little gang is augmented by Scuttle (Awkwafina), a neurotic, dim-witted diving seabird who fancies herself an expert on All Things Human.

 

Friday, January 6, 2023

Matilda the Musical: Slightly off-key

Matilda the Musical (2022) • View trailer
3.5 stars (out of five). Rated PG, for exaggerated bullying and mild profanity
Available via: Netflix
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 1.6.23

Harold Gray’s popular newspaper comic strip, Little Orphan Annie, became a joyous stage musical back in 1977, with a subsequently enjoyable transition to the big screen in 1982: fueled both by engaging performances and a bevy of delightful musical numbers, including the never-to-be-forgotten power anthem, “Tomorrow.”

 

While her school mates cower in silent terror, Matilda (Alisa Weir, right) defiantly
stands up to imperious headmistress Miss Trunchbull (Emma Thompson).


Annie and Matilda feel like thematic cousins, with similar plot and character elements, although the latter also boasts author Roald Dahl’s darker, snarkier sense of humor. I’d love to say that his 1988 children’s book enjoys the same musical success … but no. 

Despite Alisha Weir’s terrific performance in the lead role, David Hindle and Christian Huband’s wildly imaginative production design, and choreographer Ellen Kane’s effervescent work with a bevy of talented young singers and dancers, this film version of the Royal Shakespeare Company’s 2010 musical adaptation is an occasionally awkward beast. You’ll find very few hummable tunes here, most of which fall into the narrative “patter song” category; several are shoved rather clumsily into the storyline.

 

Even so, Dennis Kelly’s screenplay is rigorously faithful to the book, and its many fans will delight in all of the essential plot elements. (Kelly and Tim Minchin wrote the 2010 stage version.)

 

Matilda Wormwood (Weir) is born to parents who never, ever wanted a daughter. Her mother (Andrea Riseborough) and father (Stephen Graham) are outrageously self-centered burlesques, who banish the little girl to an attic bedroom, and miss no opportunity for emotional abuse.

 

Graham and Riseborough are hilariously grotesque in these way-over-the-top roles: vulgar, uncouth and forever garbed in costume designer Rob Howell’s opulently awful outfits. Mr. and Mrs. Wormwood believe themselves superior to the rest of the world, when in fact they’re the worst sort of ignorant buffoons.

 

Ah, but Matilda is amazingly, preternaturally smart, devouring books such as Great Expectations and Jane Eyre from a very young age, and displaying a facility for STEM topics that would make university teachers swoon. None of this means a thing to her parents, who refuse to acknowledge their daughter’s talents. 

 

Matilda’s kinder, gentler nature notwithstanding, she’s not above exacting revenge: her blustering father the most frequent target. Weir’s impishly crafty expression, at such moments, is delicious.

 

Relief comes during Matilda’s frequent visits with mobile library lady Mrs. Phelps (Sindhu Vee), whom the girl entrances with the slowly developing fantasy saga of two circus performers, swooningly in love, and forced to perform The World’s Most Dangerous Act. This enchanting bit of kid-level imagination — Matilda’s colorful re-invention of her own life — becomes an ongoing story within the story, with Mrs. Phelps hanging onto each dire setback.

Friday, June 3, 2022

Hollywood Stargirl: The sparkle is gone

Hollywood Stargirl (2022) • View trailer
Two stars (out of five). Rated PG, for mild profanity
Available via: Disney+
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 6.3.22

Sigh.

 

All that was fresh, clever and endearing about 2020’s Stargirl, is missing in this ill-advised sequel.

 

Over twin Shirley Temples, Stargirl (Grace VanderWaal, right) tries to find out why
Roxanne Martel (Uma Thurman) abandoned the music scene so many years ago,
after the well-received release of her one and only album.


The title is apt, because Hollywood Stargirl is pure product: a cynical, coldly calculated triumph of commerce over art. Everything feels processed and artificial; the dialogue throughout is particularly contrived and false.

Sadly, this “packaging” particularly applies to Grace VanderWaal. Gone is the bubbly, fresh-faced, free-spirited and wholly natural 16-year-old who starred in the first film. She has been replaced by an overly poised and coifed runway model whose gamine look has been based on Jean Seberg’s appearance in 1960’s Breathless.

 

And, my goodness, the make-up. Way too much, particularly with the overdone Elizabeth Taylor/Cleopatra eyes. I cannot imagine what make-up supervisor Geno Freeman was thinking.

 

The result? VanderWaal has been transformed into another of the interchangeable Radio Disney bubble-gum poppettes. Her uniqueness is gone.

 

In fairness, costume designer Natalie O’Brien outfits VanderWaal in dozens of adorable and wildly colorful outfits, each cuter and more vividly imaginative than the last. (The Los Angeles Times logo T-shirt Stargirl wears, at one point, is a deliberate nod to the Herald Tribune logo shirt Seberg wore in Breathless.)

 

It must be said, though, that this young woman of modest means has a stunningly large wardrobe.

 

As for the story…

 

Absent the Jerry Spinelli novel on which the first film was based, scripters Jordan Horowitz and Julia Hart — the latter also directed — have reached back to early 1940s Judy Garland/Mickey Rooney musicals, with a soupçon of 1960’s Pollyanna thrown in. But instead of “Hey kids, let’s put on a show,” this 21st century version is “Hey kids, let’s make a movie!”

 

That isn’t a bad idea, in and of itself, but Hart and Horowitz aren’t able to make their handling of said plot the slightest bit credible.

Friday, April 1, 2022

Better Nate than Ever: Broadway dreams

Better Nate Than Ever (2022) • View trailer
3.5 stars (out of five). Rated PG, for no particular reason
Available via: Disney+
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 4.1.22

A film that opens with George Benson’s “On Broadway” definitely gets off to a good start.

 

And yes: For the most part, writer/director Tim Federle’s endearing teen fantasy achieves its modest goals. This is a fairy tale for young theater nerds, and while the first act is a bit ragged, the story — and its talented title character — easily win us over in time.

 

At low ebb, with everything apparently going wrong, Nate (Rueby Wood, center in green)
stumbles across a busking band that happens to be playing — what else? —
"On Broadway."


That said, the relentless “Disneyfication” is quite distracting. This appears to be a world dominated on stage and screen solely by other Disney efforts, which is rather boorish. The Mouse House may desire world domination, but they could be more diplomatic along the way.

 

Anyway…

 

Thirteen-year-old Nate Foster (Rueby Wood, in an energetic film debut), a small-town kid, has long nurtured massive Broadway dreams; alas, nobody else shares his view of his own talent. His parents are quietly tolerant; older brother Anthony (Joshua Bassett) is horrified to discover that Nate attends school wearing — gasp, shudder — lip gloss.

 

The story opens on what Nate assumes will be his big day, with the newly posted school play cast list granting him the starring role in a musical about Abraham Lincoln. Instead, to his horror, he’s relegated to an ensemble part.

 

As a tree.

 

Disappointed beyond words, he’s all but immune to the comforting words of best friend Libby (Aria Brooks), who counsels patience and calls him out at the slightest whiff of a bad attitude. 

 

Ah, but Libby also has Big News. A hot-shot New York director is mounting a Broadway musical adaptation of the 2002 animated film Lilo & Stitch (ahem), and has announced an open casting call for the mischievous, blue-furred title character. Better still, this will take place on the same upcoming weekend when Nate’s parents will treat themselves to a spa experience … and therefore won’t be home to monitor their sons’ activities.

 

Libby has it all worked out (well, mostly). They’ll claim sleepovers with their respective parents, then hop a red-eye bus for the long trip to Manhattan. Once at the casting studio, everything will fall into place … right?

 

Well, no. Predictably.

Friday, February 25, 2022

Cyrano: Love's labours lost

Cyrano (2021) • View trailer
Three stars (out of five). Rated PG-13, for strong violence, dramatic intensity and brief profanity
Available via: Movie theaters
By Derrick Bang • Published in The Davis Enterprise, 2.25.22

We’ve seen two noteworthy big-screen versions of Edmond Rostand’s 1897 play up to now: José Ferrer’s Oscar-winning turn in director Michael Gordon’s modest 1950 American translation; and Gérard Depardieu’s robust, Oscar-nominated work in director Jean-Paul Rappeneau’s far more lavish 1990 French adaptation.

 

Cyrano (Peter Dinklage) has long loved Roxanne (Haley Bennett) from afar, but kept
silent out of the fear that she'd find his worship comical or insulting. She, in turn,
has eyes only for a new King's Guard recruit glimpsed briefly in a crowd.


Nor should we overlook star/scripter Steve Martin’s kinder, gentler rendition in 1987’s Roxanne. (Which is to say, nobody dies.)

Director Joe Wright’s Cyrano is adapted from Erica Schmidt’s new 2018 stage musical, with Peter Dinklage and Haley Bennett reprising their starring roles; Schmidt also handles the script. And while Rostand’s story seems an unlikely candidate for musical resurrection, the same could have been said of (among others) Les Miz and Evita … and “unlikely” certainly didn’t damage their popularity.

 

That said, this Cyrano is an awkward beast. Many of Aaron and Bryce Dessner’s songs aren’t memorable, and several interrupt/interfere with the on-screen action in the manner of all clumsy musicals.

 

On the positive side, Dinklage owns this film; his performance is a masterpiece of carefully nuanced expressions and body language. He puts heart and soul into even the most trivial of lines, and his frequent displays of silent, earnest anguish — it’s that sort of story — are heartbreaking.

 

Bennett’s work is similarly charismatic, albeit on a different level. Her Roxanne shimmers with giddy, joyous delight at everything she encounters: most particularly when she swoons over her desire to be swept away by passionate, soul-deep love.

 

Wright’s touch, with the accomplished assistance of frequent cinematographer colleague Seamus McGarvey, is stunning. All of their visual tricks are in evidence: the sliding walls and lengthy tracking shots; the arresting framing of scenes and characters; and the expansive, ethereal depiction of war. (Think back to their work on 2007’s Atonement.)

 

When things work here, they work extraordinarily well.

 

Unfortunately, that doesn’t happen often enough.

 

The setting is Paris, the year 1640. Roxanne attends a stage performance in a theater hosting an audience that ranges from the cream of Parisian society to thieves, pickpockets and cutpurses. She’s escorted by the powerful Duke De Guiche (Ben Mendelsohn), who craves her in a way that is slimy from his first words; rashly heedless of this, Roxanne flirts as a means of enjoying his wealth and status, while having no intention of marrying him.

 

She chances to lock eyes with newly arrived King’s Guard recruit Christian (Kelvin Harrison Jr.), buried within the rabble-rousing theatergoers. The connection is instant and electric, but he’s swept away by the crowd.