One star. Rated PG-13, for dramatic intensity, horror violence and mild sensuality
By Derrick Bang
This is what passes for scary these days?
This laughable, ludicrous swill?
Modern audiences are getting very short-changed.
![]() |
| With his suddenly homicidal fiancée prowling the darkened corridors outside their lab, Frank (Mark Duplass) cautions Eva (Sarah Bolger) to stay quiet, while he concocts a silly plan to save the day. |
This flaccid rubbish is bad in so
many ways, one scarcely knows where to begin. Luke Dawson and Jeremy Slater’s irrationally
asinine script? David Gelb’s artless, hammer-handed directing? The cast of
blithering idiots who couldn’t inject credibility into their dialogue if their
lives depended on it?
In fairness, bad line readings
aren’t entirely the fault of the cast; nobody could have made this clumsy
nonsense sound persuasive. That said, the performances also don’t deserve
placement on anybody’s résumé.
At its core, this is just another
sloppy re-tread of the hoary Frankenstein saga, with bioengineered chemicals
taking the place of good ol’ lightning. This, too, is part of the problem;
Dawson and Slater haven’t an original thought between them, and seem content to
blatantly rip off vastly superior predecessors.
And they can’t even do that well.
Frank (Mark Duplass) and his
fiancée Zoe (Olivia Wilde), running a research lab at a fictitious,
Berkeley-based university, are being assisted by graduate students Niko (Donald
Glover) and Clay (Evan Peters). The team recently has hired an undergraduate
videographer, Eva (Sarah Bolger), to record their progress.
(One cliché of bad writing, by
the way, is the affectation of granting people no more than first names:
Nothing calls faster attention to wafer-thin, one-dimensional characters.)
Although Eva’s presence gives Gelb
an excuse to dabble in “found footage”-style video inserts, this affectation —
mercifully — quickly is replaced by Michael Fimognari’s conventional
cinematography. Which, to be fair, is a point in Gelb’s favor.
Anyway...
Frank and Zoe apparently obtained
their original grant to develop a chemical “boost” that would help revive
patients who code on an operating table: something akin to adrenalin or
defibrillation. Somewhere along the way, though, they began attempting to
resurrect deceased animals with their gloppy white formula; they finally
succeed with a dog named Rocky.
Champagne all around.
But Rocky has come back ... ah
... different: warier, stronger and
more aggressive. (Cue strong memories of Stephen King’s vastly superior Pet Sematary ... and I mean the book,
not the lousy 1989 film adaptation.) Clay spouts the pseudo-scientific
gibberish that “explains” this transformation: Thanks to the injected glop, Rocky’s
brain is building massive neural networks, moving well past the usual limits of
his species. Or some such nonsense.
Not sure why that would make him
so violent, but hey, I’m no brain surgeon. (Neither is anybody in this movie.
Obviously.)

