Four stars. Rated PG-13, for dramatic intensity and brief profanity
By Derrick Bang • Originally published in The Davis Enterprise, 11.11.16
Michael Crichton’a The Andromeda Strain pretty much
invented the modern sci-fi techno thriller, and it was made into a crackling
1971 thriller by director Robert Wise.
The tone was pure procedural,
with a gaggle of scientists researching and conferencing in labs, to determine
why a highly lethal microorganism killed everybody in a small Arizona town,
except for a geriatric Sterno addict and a relentlessly cranky baby.
Few films since then have
successfully duplicated that formula, because it’s a difficult tightrope walk:
too many talking heads, and the result is boring; too much contrivance and
coincidence, and audiences roll their eyes in contemptuous disbelief.
Director Denis Villeneuve gets
the balance just right with Arrival,
easily one of the most intelligent “first contact” movies Hollywood ever has
delivered. Scripter Eric Heisserer embraced the challenging assignment of adapting
sci-fi author Ted Chiang’s 2000
Nebula Award-winning novella, and the result is impressively faithful:
fascinating, clever and suspenseful, with an out-there finale certain to fuel
debates as impassioned as those that greeted the conclusion of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
The story also boasts one of the
most truly unusual alien cultures ever conceived, the depiction of which is
likely to forever change most viewers’ perception and understanding of
language.
Finally, the film is an
uncomfortably timely reminder of the dangerous levels of nationalism and
xenophobia currently running amok throughout this country and the globe, and
the consequences of failing to recognize that — at the end of the day — we’re a
single species sharing this planet, and that it behooves us to behave
accordingly.
To cases, then:
Northeastern university professor
Louise Banks (Amy Adams), an internationally respected linguist, is surprised
one day to discover that her huge, entry-level language class is almost empty.
The reason becomes clear as breaking news reports interrupt all radio and
television broadcasts: A disturbingly large something
has landed in a deserted Montana meadow.
Actually, “landed” is the wrong
word; the semi-cylindrical object hovers about 20 feet off the ground.
The university is evacuated;
Banks heads to her car as Air Force jets scramble overhead. She returns to a
beautiful but empty home, with a gorgeous lakeside view that she shares with
nobody. She returns to her office the following day — likely because routine is
the only constant in her life — and finds the campus utterly deserted. Until,
that is, her office is invaded by a group of soldiers led by military
intelligence officer Col. Weber (Forest Whitaker).
After a bit of procedural
posturing — the arch humor is subtle, but perceptible — Banks winds up sharing
a helicopter ride with theoretical physicist Ian Donnelly (Jeremy Renner).
Their destination: the aforementioned Montana field, where U.S. forces have set
up a provisional base. Because, well, the alien craft’s inhabitants are
attempting to communicate.
In a manner so unfamiliar that it
seems no more than gibberish.
But bridging that conversational
gap is critical, because this Montana whatzit is only one of 12 identical
“visitors” scattered randomly throughout the globe. Some are in “friendly”
regions such as Australia; others — notably Russia, China and Pakistan — not so
much. The key questions must be addressed: Why are they here? What is their
purpose?
And the answers must come fairly
quickly, before one of the more belligerent international “hosts” does
something provocatively stupid, perhaps initiating a chain-reaction attack by
the visitors.
Villeneuve cannily withholds
significant details, playing on viewer curiosity and expectation; even the
initial appearance of the Montana-based spacecraft is delayed for dramatic
impact. But the director doesn’t cheat us; we eventually follow Banks and
Donnelly into the ship — a gravity-defying experience, for them and us — and witness their introduction
to beings eventually dubbed Heptapods.
But how, precisely, to bridge the
language barrier? Particularly when it becomes clear that “language” is an
entirely different concept to the Heptapods?
Revealing more would be
irresponsible, because much of this film’s allure comes from the manner in
which Villeneuve and Heisserer tease, suggest and illuminate. It’s an enlightening
reminder that the pleasing-to-the-eye extraterrestrials that populate the Star Trek and Star Wars universes are a bipedal conceit; truly alien visitors are
much more likely to be psychologically disconcerting, even shocking, in their
utter weirdness.
Villeneuve and Heisserer present
precisely that atmosphere of unsettling uncertainty; the tone, at times, is
quasi-scary. The very environment feels as unstable as the national and
international tension that magnifies, as days turn into weeks. Fear-stoked
riots and looting become the norm across the United States. Hectoring, hawkish
media pundits advocate a shoot-first response.
All of which is much more
frightening than what Banks and Donnelly confront, because we know — from
recent events — that such hate-filled bile likely would reflect the national mood.
The story’s emotional core
belongs to Banks, for reasons that I’ll not specify, and Adams rises to this
challenge. She radiates quiet pain, an almost crippling degree of misery
frequently revealed in her gaze; her wan smiles are to be treasured. (We think
we know the source of this grief, but assumptions can be misleading.) At the same
time, Adams can project the giddy, almost childlike excitement of a
pathologically focused academic, each time Banks makes an intuitive
breakthrough.
Renner’s Donnelly is quite a
contrast: a cheerful, self-assured theoretician so wrapped up in science and
math, that Banks’ theories and deployment of language are just as eye-opening
and instructive to him, as they are to Weber. She’s forced, at times, to treat
both men like grade-schoolers: patiently explaining linguistic concepts to
justify her approach with the Heptapods, cautioning how even a single word —
such as tool — could prove damaging
during translation.
Whitaker is ramrod-stiff as
Weber, but the man isn’t a military drone; he’s respectful, even apologetic,
despite trying to serve two masters. On the one hand, he comes to value the
input from his two civilian academics; on the other, Weber obviously struggles
to retain control of the operation, as time passes, and his unseen D.C.
superiors chafe over the absence of telling results.
CIA Agent Halpern (Michael
Stuhlbarg), on the other hand, is precisely the sort of impatient hawk who
never should be placed in charge. Stuhlbarg makes the man condescending,
challenging and contemptuous; he’d never
advocate bringing in the likes of Banks and Donnelly. Halpern personifies
institutionalized arrogance.
Visual effects supervisor Louis
Morin and production designer Patrice Vermette do a sensational job, not merely
with the Heptapods, but also the eerie ambiance of their massive, gravity- and
atmosphere-controlled vessel. Martine Bertrand also deserves a shout-out for a
most unusual contribution: the development of the aliens’ wildly strange written
language.
On the other hand, Villeneuve
indulges in some irritating stylistic affectations. He favors unfocused
establishing shots, cinematographer Bradford Young leaving a tableau fuzzy
until focusing on one thing or person, and then gradually bringing clarity to
the entire scene. That might make sense within the Heptapod ships, but it’s
damn annoying within the various human environments.
Villeneuve also makes unusual use
of composer Johann Johannsson, the dramatic score often clashing with the
clicks, chrrs and whirrs that sound designer Dave Whitehead created for the
Heptapod “language.” At times, it’s impossible to know whether we — and the
story’s human characters — are hearing the Heptapods, or mood-enhancing
underscore.
Finally, Villeneuve needlessly
batters our emotions during the climactic epilogue, which runs perhaps 30
telling seconds too long.
These tics aren’t ruinous, but
they can be distracting. Which is a shame, because — for the most part — Villeneuve
holds us in thrall. Arrival is a
rarity these days: a thoughtful, cautionary sci-fi drama that relies on intellect
and insight, rather than explosions and zap-gun pyrotechnics. And it serves as a
warning, much the way 1951’s The Day the
Earth Stood Still did, so many decades ago.
A pity, really, that we don’t
seem to have advanced all that much, in the meanwhile.
No comments:
Post a Comment