Four stars. Rated R, for profanity, extreme violence and gore, and drug content
By Derrick Bang
South Korean filmmaker Bong Joon
Ho came to my attention in early 2007, with the Stateside release of The Host, a taut, eye-popping monster
flick that blended savvy political commentary with impressive levels of tension
and excitement ... and more than a little dark-dark-dark humor.
Ho delivers the same mix with Snowpiercer, with a notable upgrade:
While portions of The Host reflected
the naturalistic, guerrilla-style filmmaking of a modest budget, this new film
is an A-list production all the way. It looks spectacular in every respect, and
is further enhanced by a top-quality cast of familiar faces from both American
and South Korean cinema.
The grim, cautionary nature of
Ho’s storytelling hasn’t diminished; he remains convinced that humanity doesn’t
deserve the planetary paradise on which we reside. Give us half a chance, and
we’ll screw it up. The horrific creature that wreaked havoc in The Host was spawned by arrogant Americans
who polluted South Korea’s Han River with dangerous chemicals; the
post-apocalyptic events in Snowpiercer
result from our “brilliant” attempt to reverse the effects of global warming.
I’m reminded of the conversations
known to have taken place prior to the initial atomic bomb tests in the 1940s —
attributed to either or both Edward Teller and J. Robert Oppenheimer, depending
on the source — and which explored the possibility that even a single bomb
might ignite Earth’s atmosphere via a fusion reaction, and thus destroy the
world. Such fears notwithstanding, Those In Charge pulled the switch, and I
guess we can conclude that God (and Mother Nature) watched over us that day.
Luck isn’t with us this time. The
essential back-story unfolds during a quick montage prologue, as news reports
discuss the dispersal of a chemical agent designed to reverse the effects of
global warming. We may well imagine a similar cautionary conversation about
unintended consequences, but no matter: This switch also is pulled, perhaps
just as recklessly, and the results are miraculous. At first.
Until the entire planet is
plunged into a lethal ice age, destroying all life.
But this catastrophic result
wasn’t instantaneous; time allowed a microcosm of humanity to be saved on board
a sleek, lengthy train originally designed as the ultimate, self-contained vacation
vehicle for rich tourists wanting to circumnavigate the globe. Now transformed
into a futuristic Noah’s Ark, there’s just one problem: Seventeen years have
passed, and there’s still no safe place to “land.”
The train races around the world,
its nickname derived from the pointed “snout” and high-tech engines and
gyroscopic computers that allow it to blast through the frequent snowdrifts and
frozen ice that block the track.
The passengers, meanwhile, have
been sorted according to the usual class tyranny wielded by those with the
power to make such decisions: The elite few enjoy lives of luxury in the
train’s posh front section, while the dirtier trailing cars have become a slum,
choked by “regular folks” who are perpetually cold and hungry, clinging
desperately to the waning vestiges of their humanity.
To make matters even worse,
emissaries from the front routinely visit the back — always accompanied by
armed guards — with requests for skilled labor of one sort or another.
(Parallels to WWII-era Jewish musicians who saved themselves by performing for
their Nazi captors are, no doubt, intentional.) Even more unsettling: the
occasional conscription of small children whose bodies and arms first are
measured by a stern-faced “nurse.” Such children are taken away, never to be
seen again.
Our imaginations run riot,
already deeply unsettled by the persuasive power of Ondrej Nekvasil’s marvelous
production design. To be sure, this dystopian storyline is preposterous on all
sorts of levels, but we buy into it nonetheless ... and, having done so,
immediately are invested in the fates of those soon to become our protagonists.
Parables and metaphors don’t need to make complete sense, in order to remain
powerful.
Long-simmering plans for revolt,
by those in the tail section, erupt with the kidnapping of yet two more
children. Curtis (Chris Evans), long guided by the elderly Gilliam (John Hurt),
has been making such plans for a long time. (Weeks? Months? Time is a vague
concept for people who’ve not seen daylight for 17 years.) The younger Edgar
(Jamie Bell), who worships Curtis, is eager for a fight ... but the latter has
been advising caution, and patience.
Until now. These two most recent
children belong, respectively, to Tanya (Octavia Spencer) and Andrew (Ewen
Bremner); their anguish will not be denied. Recognizing that momentum and
surprise are in their favor, Curtis leads the charge on the first guarded
checkpoint that separates their squalid cars from ... whatever is on the other
side.
That is this script’s most
fascinating tease, at least initially: None of these people has seen what lies
behind the first set of doors. Taking each subsequent car is guaranteed to be a
struggle, with every fresh revelation just as eye-popping to us, as it is to
our heroes.
Did I mention struggle? Let’s
amend that to limb-severing, bone-crunching bloodbath. The resulting melees
have the grim desperation typical of hyper-violent Asian crime-noir and martial-arts
cinema, with breathtaking battles akin to what we’ve seen in genre classics
such as Oldboy and, more recently, The Raid and its sequel. Axes, knives
and clubs figure prominently, bullets having become “extinct” as a result of
earlier, unsuccessful revolts by the disenfranchised.
As I’ve warned before, with other
genre films, this one’s not for the faint of heart.
Evans, well recognized as the
red, white and true-blue Captain America, is an equally fine choice for this
darker, bleaker character. Initially, Curtis is faced with a difficult but
fairly uncomplicated task: Move ever forward. The stakes are high, and the
enemies ruthless, but Curtis is bolstered by what seems a clear moral
imperative. As the sortie proceeds, however, his choices become more difficult,
and even agonizing: the trade-offs harder to rationalize.
The enemy also becomes less
tangible, the efforts at bargaining more tempting, the threatened reprisals
more horrific. How far does a “good leader” push his followers, before deciding
that the escalating sacrifice can’t be justified?
Evans displays the necessary
angst with the tortured bearing of the truly damned, his showcase moment coming
when he confesses — as much to himself, as to his listener — how his behavior
now, 17 years later, has been shaped by his memory of what it was like, when he
and his fellow “norms” first were allowed to board the train.
Bell is suitably feisty and
impulsive as the hot-tempered Edgar, eager to serve at Curtis’ side. Spencer
personifies the vengeful mother tiger who will do anything — anything — to retrieve her cub. Tanya also
unleashes an occasional one-liner with the mordant comic timing that made
Spencer’s Academy Award-winning performance in The Help so memorable.
That darkly humorous tone is
important here, as it was in The Host,
in terms of granting fleeting release from the narrative’s ghastly horrors. No
surprise, then, that Bremner’s Andrew — despite an early, crippling injury — is
presented as a burlesque: more lunatic clown than rational human being. His
very presence shorthands the underlying message: How could anybody remain sane,
under such circumstances?
The standout performance, though,
comes from Tilda Swinton: so
memorably appalling as Mason, the primary villain of this piece. Mason is the
“face” of the Great Wilford: the long-unseen genius who designed the train,
back in the day, and now keeps it running, and therefore keeps everybody aboard
alive.
All but unrecognized behind
oversized false teeth and equally huge spectacles, Swinton is “authority” taken
to dreadful extremes: the condescending schoolteacher who will rap a
mischievous little boy’s knuckles until they’re raw and bleeding, all the while
insisting that he’s “making” her punish him in such fashion. We’ve not seen casual
evil depicted so well since Louise Fletcher brought Nurse Ratched to similar
nightmarish life, in 1975’s One Flew Over
the Cuckoo’s Nest.
Kang-ho Song and Ah-sung Ko, both
remembered from The Host, re-unite
here as Namgoong and Yona: He’s the engineer who designed all the increasingly
complex doors that separate one train car from the next, and she’s his
daughter. They’re both hooked on kronol, an addictive hallucinogenic drug
fabricated from atomic waste; Namgoong agrees to help Curtis only as long as
the latter can supply more kronol, and of course the engineer’s usefulness
decreases as he continues to indulge.
Hurt nails his role as the wise
old warrior who clearly knows more than he’s telling, and Alison Pill is a hoot
as a beatific teacher — boy, did she
drink the Kool-Aid! — we meet once our heroes have battled far enough forward
to encounter the children of the privileged class.
Pill’s grade-school instructor is
another example of Ho’s unsettling blend of humor and horror: We frequently
don’t know whether to laugh or cringe. Another memorably strong disconnect
occurs during a savage battle between Curtis’ allies and blade-wielding
soldiers: a skirmish that stops cold — much like the WWI “Christmas miracle”
between Allied and German soldiers — as the train crosses the bridge that marks
their collective journey-to-nowhere’s 18th anniversary.
Seconds later, that milestone
acknowledged by all, the fighting resumes.
Nekvasil’s superb production
design isn’t confined to the train itself, although each freshly revealed car
is yet another masterpiece of steampunk technology and extrapolated social
values turned hideously rancid. Before long, our heroes also work their way far
enough forward to reach cars with windows, allowing their — and our — first glimpse
of the Earth’s now-frozen landscape: harsh, surreal and quietly shocking.
Rarely has cautionary sci-fi been presented so persuasively.
Much as I love the bulk of Ho’s
ambitious film, however, his narrative goes off the rails during a needlessly protracted
and clumsily philosophical finale. Ho’s script, with an assist from Kelly
Masterson (Before the Devil Knows You’re
Dead), is adapted very loosely from Le
Transperceneige, a 1982 French graphic novel by Jacques Lob and Jean-Marc
Rochette. Ho’s effort to “improve” upon that original bogs down beneath preachy
third-act revelations that ruin what has, until this moment, been one helluva
ride.
Indeed, you’ll likely be quite annoyed upon exiting the theater
... and that’s a shame, because there’s much to admire about Snowpiercer. At its best, this is slick,
sharp-edged sci-fi satire: a cautionary tale that entertains while warning
against the dangers of amorality and the folly of human hubris.
Not quite a dystopian classic,
then, like District 9, with its perfect finale. But certainly a
near-miss worth embracing.
Good review Derrick. It's the type of movie that isn't afraid to be as weird as it wants. And for that, I have to show a lot of respect.
ReplyDelete